Sign up for free to get the latest from greenbang direct to your inbox
 
Home | Research Store | Work With Us | Events | Insight | Press | About | Newsletter | Contact

Breaking: Earth might be able to absorb more CO2 than thought

Published Monday, 9th November 2009

967373_planet_earth_31The Earth’s ecosystems and oceans might have a much greater capacity for absorbing carbon dioxide than has previously been thought, according to new research from the University of Bristol.

That finding runs contrary to a significant body of science that predicts the planet’s ability to take up carbon dioxide will diminish as emissions keep rising.

Wolfgang Knorr says he’s found that the balance between the airborne and the absorbed fraction of carbon dioxide has stayed approximately constant since 1850, despite emissions of carbon dioxide having risen from about 2 billion tonnes a year in 1850 to 35 billion tonnes a year now.

Knorr’s study, published online in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, is based solely on measurements and statistical data, including historical records extracted from Antarctic ice, rather than on computations with complex climate models.

His findings have implications for future climate change policies, because emission targets to be negotiated at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen early next month have been based on projections that have a carbon-free sink already factored in. Some researchers have cautioned against this approach, pointing at evidence that suggests the sink has already started to decrease.

However, Knorr cautioned that his study is not necessarily cause for optimism.

“Like all studies of this kind, there are uncertainties in the data, so rather than relying on nature to provide a free service, soaking up our waste carbon, we need to ascertain why the proportion being absorbed has not changed,” he said.

Knorr’s study also found that emissions from deforestation might have been overestimated by between 18 and 75 per cent. This would agree with results published last week in Nature Geoscience, which concluded that emissions have been overestimated by at least a factor of two.

Bookmark and share:
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • del.icio.us
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF




Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.












RELATED NEWS

Latest Insight

What is the smart grid? thumbnail

What is the smart grid?

Governments, energy companies and tech firms all talk about the “smart grid” a
Clean-energy incentives: Here … then gone thumbnail

Clean-energy incentives: Here … then gone

Call it penny-wise, pound-foolish (or Euro-foolish) … although “cutting off your nose to
New buildings – even the ‘green’ ones – aren’t so green thumbnail

New buildings – even the ‘green’ ones – aren’t so green

The sustainable-living mantra of “reduce, reuse, recycle” is usually applied to low-tech or

LATEST REPORTS
1

Who’s the leading smart-city brand?

More than half of the world’s nearly seven billion people now live in urban areas, and that proportion is expected to reach almost 69 per cent by 2050. To avoid pushing local and global systems to the point of collapse, cities will need to become much smarter and more efficient Read more ...
more info
2

Managing the smart-grid data overload

Developing the UK’s smart-grid infrastructure will require communications and data technologies that can manage far more information than utilities must handle today. That’s the focus of a strategy report from Greenbang Research: “Enabling the UK’s smart-grid future: The wireless spectrum debate.” The report answers such questions as: Should dedicated Read more ...
more info
3

Incentives fire up UK solar market

The introduction of the feed-in tariff (FIT) incentive policy on 1 April has sparked an explosive reaction in the UK renewable energy market with solar leading the way in installations, according to a new Greenbang research report titled, “The UK’s Feed-in Tariff: Impact, response and market trends for the decade Read more ...
more info