Greenbang logo

Carbon injection gets $126 million funding injection

By jumperhead on Friday, 9th May 2008

chimney1.jpgMuch like Russell Brand, it looks like the Department of Energy isn’t afraid of sharing the love. (Greenbang’s already noted its grant-dispersing frenzy here) It seems that there’s little the DoE isn’t prepared to fund in terms of renewable energy: hydro, solar, biofuels – a strategy that suggests it’s kind of prepared to kiss a lot of frogs in order to find its prince.

Today, it’s got its tongue down the throat of carbon capture – the technology which < href=”http://www.greenbang.com/3072/carbon-capture-as-much-use-a-chocolate-teapot-greenpeace/”>Greenpeace picked out as a fat lot of use in stopping global warming earlier this week.

Nevertheless, the DoE is pressing ahead with the tech and financing a handful of projects to the tune of $126 million to the West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (WESTCARB) and the Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (MRCSP).

Apparently, the idea is to store one million tonnes of carbon in Ohio and California.

Here’s the whole skinny from the DoE:

The new projects will demonstrate the entire CO2 injection process — pre-injection characterization, injection process monitoring, and post-injection monitoring — for large scale injections of one million tons or more to test the ability of different geologic settings to permanently store CO2. DOE plans to invest $126.6 million in the two projects over the next 10 years, while the industry partners will provide $56.6 million in cost-shared funds to make these projects a success.

In the first stages of the projects, researchers will characterize the selected sites. Over the first 24 months, researchers and industry partners will complete the modeling, monitoring, and infrastructure improvements needed before CO2 can be injected. These efforts will establish a baseline for future monitoring after CO2 injection begins. Each project will then inject one million tons or more of CO2 into a regionally significant storage formation. After injection, investigators will monitor and model the fate of the CO2 to determine the effectiveness of the storage reservoir.

The latest projects to be awarded are outlined below:

Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (MRCSP) — The MRCSP, led by Battelle Memorial Laboratories, will demonstrate CO2 storage in the Mount Simon Sandstone. This geologic formation stretches from Kentucky through Ohio and has the potential to store more than 100 years of CO2 emissions from major point sources in the region. The MRCSP will inject approximately one million tons of CO2 from an ethanol production facility. In this area of Ohio, the Mount Simon formation is approximately 3,000 feet deep. The CO2 will be injected on the facility site, and MRCSP will be responsible for development of the infrastructure, operations, closure, and monitoring of the injected CO2. The MRCSP covers Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky, West Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New York, and Michigan.
Total Project Cost: $92,846,271
DOE Share: $61,096,271
Partner Share: $31,750,000

West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (WESTCARB) — The WESTCARB Partnership, led by the California Energy Commission, will conduct a geologic CO2 storage project in the San Joaquin Basin in Central California. The project will inject 1 million tons of CO2 over 4 years into deep (7,000+ feet) geologic formations below a 50-megawatt, zero-emission power plant in Kimberlina, CA. The Clean Energy Systems plant uses natural or synthesis gas in an oxyfuel system and produces a relatively pure stream of CO2. This CO2 will be compressed and injected into one of a number of potential storage formations below the surface of the plant. WESTCARB will develop, operate, and close the injection site as well as monitor the fate of the injected CO2. The WESTCARB Partnership includes California, Arizona, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Alaska, Hawaii, and British Columbia.

Total Project Cost: $90,594,099
DOE Share: $65,606,584
Partner Share: $24,987,515

Tags: , , , , , , ,

READERS COMMENTS - Have your say...




Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Additional comments powered by BackType

RELATED NEWS

LATEST HEADLINES

One peak we should bring on faster: Peak plastics thumbnail

One peak we should bring on faster: Peak plastics

While most of the peaks we see looming today — peak oil, peak
Jurdy: To the dump, to the dump, to the dump, dump, dump thumbnail

Jurdy: To the dump, to the dump, to the dump, dump, dump

Jurdy finds another tough job to fill …
Finally: A plan to make clean energy a business opportunity thumbnail

Finally: A plan to make clean energy a business opportunity

Ensuring sustainable energy and resources in the future is all about how you
Perfect technology is impossible, but keep trying anyway thumbnail

Perfect technology is impossible, but keep trying anyway

“I guess I could be pretty pissed off about
Plan for a solar future means knowing when the sun won’t shine thumbnail

Plan for a solar future means knowing when the sun won’t shine

While energy experts elsewhere are looking for answers to
Wild warming or sulphur rain? Climate ‘party planners’ can’t decide thumbnail

Wild warming or sulphur rain? Climate ‘party planners’ can’t decide

Imagine you and your office mates are trying to