COP15 Day 12: Outcome so far is ‘vague, ‘inadequate,’ ‘shame’
Published Saturday, 19th December 2009
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed or jump onto our free newsletter. You can now also find us on twitter and Facebook too. Come and join the discussion.
Editor’s note: Greenbang will be providing daily dispatches and ongoing updates from the climate change talks in Copenhagen, and is covering the conference virtually to keep our carbon footprint low.
Following are developments from today’s events at the COP15 climate conference in Copenhagen:
Climate Interactive says the latest draft text for the Copenhagen Accord, offered late in the night, has “too few quantifiable targets for our team to adequately analyse it.” The result is that Climate Interactive’s Climate Scoreboard — the projected level of warming based on nations’ existing policies — remains unchanged at 3.9 degrees C of warming by 2100, far beyond the 2 degrees C considered to be the threshold for catastrophic climate change. The draft also has the G77 bloc of developing nations “crying murder,” according to New Scientist, with the charge that “this locks developing nations & the poor of developing nations in poverty for ever.”
The responses coming in from other delegates in the early morning hours include: “Our future is not for sale” (Tuvalu), “You toss the paper on the table and walk away… coup d’etat on un process” (Venezuela) and “Not respectful of democratic mechanisms that exist” (Bolivia).
Speaking in Copenhagen today, US President Barack Obama said, “After months of talk, and two weeks of negotiations, I believe that the pieces of that accord are now clear. First, all major economies must put forward decisive national actions that will reduce their emissions, and begin to turn the corner on climate change. I’m pleased that many of us have already done so, and I’m confident that America will fulfill the commitments that we have made: cutting our emissions in the range of 17 per cent by 2020, and by more than 80 per cent by 2050 in line with final legislation. Second, we must have a mechanism to review whether we are keeping our commitments, and to exchange this information in a transparent manner. These measures need not be intrusive, or infringe upon sovereignty. They must, however, ensure that an accord is credible, and that we are living up to our obligations. For without such accountability, any agreement would be empty words on a page. Third, we must have financing that helps developing countries adapt, particularly the least-developed and most vulnerable to climate change. America will be a part of fast-start funding that will ramp up to $10 billion in 2012. And, yesterday, Secretary Clinton made it clear that we will engage in a global effort to mobilize $100 billion in financing by 2020, if — and only if — it is part of the broader accord that I have just described.”
More than half of the world’s nearly seven billion people now live in urban areas, and that proportion is expected to reach almost 69 per cent by 2050. To avoid pushing local and global systems to the point of collapse, cities will need to become much smarter and more efficient Read more ...
Developing the UK’s smart-grid infrastructure will require communications and data technologies that can manage far more information than utilities must handle today. That’s the focus of a strategy report from Greenbang Research: “Enabling the UK’s smart-grid future: The wireless spectrum debate.” The report answers such questions as: Should dedicated Read more ...
The introduction of the feed-in tariff (FIT) incentive policy on 1 April has sparked an explosive reaction in the UK renewable energy market with solar leading the way in installations, according to a new Greenbang research report titled, “The UK’s Feed-in Tariff: Impact, response and market trends for the decade Read more ...