Greenbang logo

DoE spends $1.3bn on CCS research

By jumperhead on Thursday, 26th June 2008

embers.jpgGreenbang is wondering what’s carbon capture’s secret. Not the technological secret, more the secret of how it’s sucking in money like a back hole sucks in the Starship Enterprise and/or Doctor Who.

The last few times that Greenbang has written the words ‘carbon’ and ‘capture’ and ’storage’ she seems to have been groping for the $ key straight after. Today, my friends, is no exception – Greenbang will be writing the words ‘carbon’ and ‘capture’ and then ‘has pulled in $1.3 billion in funding.

Today’s donor is the US Department of Energy, who’s ponying up around $0.3 billion next year and $1billion the following year for research into systems that can clean up dirty, dirty coal.

Anyone who wants to get their slice of money pie (all carbon capture projects will need to be cost shared) will have to get their applications in by 8 October.

More from the DoE:

By funding multiple projects DOE expects at least to double the amount of CO2 sequestered compared to the amount under the concept announced in 2003. When these plants are operational, they will be the cleanest coal-fired power plants in the world – each capturing and storing an expected 1 million metric tons of carbon dioxide per year.

Subject to compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act, the FOA envisions commercial operation of IGCC (Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle) or other clean coal power plants equipped with CCS technology to begin as soon as the plants are commissioned by the end of 2015. The restructured FutureGen approach will focus on the challenges associated with avoiding and reducing carbon emissions through sequestration. Technical, economic, and operational results from multiple projects will inform and guide the promulgation of regulations related to wide-scale carbon sequestration activities and at the same time will help establish technologies and protocols for CO2 monitoring, mitigation and verification.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

READERS COMMENTS - Have your say...




Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Additional comments powered by BackType

RELATED NEWS

LATEST HEADLINES

One peak we should bring on faster: Peak plastics thumbnail

One peak we should bring on faster: Peak plastics

While most of the peaks we see looming today — peak oil, peak
Jurdy: To the dump, to the dump, to the dump, dump, dump thumbnail

Jurdy: To the dump, to the dump, to the dump, dump, dump

Jurdy finds another tough job to fill …
Finally: A plan to make clean energy a business opportunity thumbnail

Finally: A plan to make clean energy a business opportunity

Ensuring sustainable energy and resources in the future is all about how you
Perfect technology is impossible, but keep trying anyway thumbnail

Perfect technology is impossible, but keep trying anyway

“I guess I could be pretty pissed off about
Plan for a solar future means knowing when the sun won’t shine thumbnail

Plan for a solar future means knowing when the sun won’t shine

While energy experts elsewhere are looking for answers to
Wild warming or sulphur rain? Climate ‘party planners’ can’t decide thumbnail

Wild warming or sulphur rain? Climate ‘party planners’ can’t decide

Imagine you and your office mates are trying to