Whitepaper writing services from Greenbang - click here to find out more.
 
Home | Research Store | Work With Us | Events | Insight | Press | About | Newsletter | Contact

Are emissions from cow farts the farmer’s fault?

Published Thursday, 3rd April 2008

957402_cows.jpgHere’s a bit of research about the break-down of carbon footprints per employee.

A report from BASE suggests that the greenhouse-gas footprint of the ‘employee’ is way higher than that of the ‘individual’ – basically because the way you do the sums is different.

Base used all official statistics to measure this, it should be said, and didn’t do any of the measuring itself. And you can always make statistics say what you need them to.

But it’s still interesting nevertheless.

Base argues that while the UK Government reckons each person is responsible for around 4.5 tonnes of CO2 annually, this fails to account for everything a person ‘does’.

“Clearly, this does not tell the whole story about the real level of emissions attributable to individuals,” they say.

Well that in itself is a massive assumption. Who is responsible for emissions of a business? Can you say it’s the employee?

It’s certainly no bad thing to alert employees to the impact of the industry they belong to. But to say they are responsible is a step too far in our boat.

But it’s a great debate and here’s what they say:

“[T]he largest employee greenhouse gas footprints lie, by somedistance, in the energy sector (1127.04 tonnes). This is followed by agriculture, where – as in the case of construction, somewhat counter-intuitively – over 200 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions can be attributed to each employee annually (217.38 tonnes). This is a worse performance than both the transport and manufacturing sectors, where each employee represents 67 tonnes (67.01) and 41 tonnes (41.15) of greenhouse gas emissions respectively.”

But Greenbang has a big problem with this – the methodology.

Can you really argue that employees are responsible for this much CO2? Surely it’s the people driving the business. Where do you draw the line with the argument? Do employees of farming businesses then take reponsibility for all the methane cows fart out?

Maybe, just maybe, one day they will.

Bookmark and share:
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • del.icio.us
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF
  1. Ed says:

    The responsibility for the emmissions should not fall upon the employees but upon the consumers who demand the products and the company Directors who chose what method they should fulfil that demand.

    As we are all consumers, we are all responsible, especially for things like cows farting (except vegetarians, and they fart more themselves anyway so it probably balances out).

    Crackers.

  2. Liz says:

    We are all responsible as consumers for what industry makes and which we then buy. If we didn’t buy, they wouldn’t make. As employees we are responsible for leaving lights and computers on, expecting to work in shirt-sleeves all winter, to be cool in summer – to the point where we have to wear jumpers to keep warm. So we can argue responsibility. On the other hand, we could translate this as us having power – the power to argue for change from within as well.




Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.












RELATED NEWS

Latest Insight

Which countries produce the most wind energy? thumbnail

Which countries produce the most wind energy?

The world was producing nearly 238 gigawatts (GW) of wind energy as of
China ‘dumping’ low-cost solar cells on market? US says ‘yes’ thumbnail

China ‘dumping’ low-cost solar cells on market? US says ‘yes’

Have China’s solar cell makers been “dumping” their products on the US market
The 10 most water-stressed countries in the world thumbnail

The 10 most water-stressed countries in the world

From space, our planet might look like a “big blue marble” rich with

LATEST REPORTS
1

Who’s the leading smart-city brand?

More than half of the world’s nearly seven billion people now live in urban areas, and that proportion is expected to reach almost 69 per cent by 2050. To avoid pushing local and global systems to the point of collapse, cities will need to become much smarter and more efficient Read more ...
more info
2

Managing the smart-grid data overload

Developing the UK’s smart-grid infrastructure will require communications and data technologies that can manage far more information than utilities must handle today. That’s the focus of a strategy report from Greenbang Research: “Enabling the UK’s smart-grid future: The wireless spectrum debate.” The report answers such questions as: Should dedicated Read more ...
more info
3

Incentives fire up UK solar market

The introduction of the feed-in tariff (FIT) incentive policy on 1 April has sparked an explosive reaction in the UK renewable energy market with solar leading the way in installations, according to a new Greenbang research report titled, “The UK’s Feed-in Tariff: Impact, response and market trends for the decade Read more ...
more info