Sign up for free to get the latest from greenbang direct to your inbox
 
Home | Research Store | Work With Us | Events | Insight | Press | About | Newsletter | Contact

In the US, battle of the bulbs far from over

Published Wednesday, 13th July 2011

The good news for US energy efficiency is that an effort to repeal legislation mandating more efficient light bulbs failed this week in a vote in the House of Representatives.

The bad news is that, had the repeal effort not required a two-thirds majority, the measure would have passed … at least in the House.

The vote on the “Better Use of Light Bulbs Act” was 233 in favor, 193 against, with one representative voting present and four not voting. While the bill received a majority vote of approval — mostly from Republicans — it fell short of the two-thirds needed to pass as an expedited piece of legislation.

The proposal sponsored by Texas GOP Rep. Joe Barton would have repealed parts of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, which was signed into law by then-President George W. Bush. The targeted parts of the 2007 act call for light bulbs to be more efficient than they are today — 25 to 30 percent more efficient starting in 2012, and 65 percent more by 2020 — and does not “outlaw” incandescent light bulbs as some “BULB Act” proponents suggest. In a political atmosphere in which every stand is viewed through a highly polarized lens, though, light bulbs have become not a source of illumination or a consumer of electricity, but a litmus test. And so a bill signed just a few short years ago by a Republican president is now cast as yet another Big Government infringement on a citizen’s right to waste energy and carbon as much as he or she chooses.

While anti-efficiency pols lost this battle, they’re not yet ready to concede the war. Another bill targeting efficient light bulb standards is still waiting in the wings in Washington, and some states — Texas among them — are looking at ways to protect old-fashioned incandescents that are manufactured within their borders. Such silly actions don’t bode well for a future that needs all the smarts (technology and otherwise) it can get.

Bookmark and share:
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • del.icio.us
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF











RELATED NEWS

Latest Insight

Germany’s no-nukes plan leads to gas pains thumbnail

Germany’s no-nukes plan leads to gas pains

Germany’s already an undisputed powerhouse in renewable energy, but it will need to
Which countries produce the most wind energy? thumbnail

Which countries produce the most wind energy?

The world was producing nearly 238 gigawatts (GW) of wind energy as of
China ‘dumping’ low-cost solar cells on market? US says ‘yes’ thumbnail

China ‘dumping’ low-cost solar cells on market? US says ‘yes’

Have China’s solar cell makers been “dumping” their products on the US market

LATEST REPORTS
1

Who’s the leading smart-city brand?

More than half of the world’s nearly seven billion people now live in urban areas, and that proportion is expected to reach almost 69 per cent by 2050. To avoid pushing local and global systems to the point of collapse, cities will need to become much smarter and more efficient Read more ...
more info
2

Managing the smart-grid data overload

Developing the UK’s smart-grid infrastructure will require communications and data technologies that can manage far more information than utilities must handle today. That’s the focus of a strategy report from Greenbang Research: “Enabling the UK’s smart-grid future: The wireless spectrum debate.” The report answers such questions as: Should dedicated Read more ...
more info
3

Incentives fire up UK solar market

The introduction of the feed-in tariff (FIT) incentive policy on 1 April has sparked an explosive reaction in the UK renewable energy market with solar leading the way in installations, according to a new Greenbang research report titled, “The UK’s Feed-in Tariff: Impact, response and market trends for the decade Read more ...
more info