Next hot market: Google search carbon offsets?
Published Monday, 12th January 2009
While news stories abound about IT’s growing environmental footprint, geeks everywhere are abuzz today about a Google-centered eco-controversy. The brouhaha centers on one query: how much carbon dioxide does your typical Google search generate?
According to Harvard University Alex Wissner-Gross, each Google search is responsible for 7 grams of carbon emissions. To put that in less virtual terms, he suggests every two searches generate as much carbon dioxide as it does to boil a kettle of water for tea.
Or does it? The wags at The Register skewer Wissner-Gross’s yet-to-be published research, hauling out a host of objections. First, they argue, bringing a kettle to boiling produces between 50 and 60 grams of carbon dioxide, not the 15 grams cited by Wissner-Gross. Next, they point out, it should be noted that Wissner-Gross stands to benefit from the marketing of carbon offsets (in addition to his Harvard post, he’s CTO of CO2Stats, whose slogan is “making Websites green”).
The Register then moves on to identify a culprit far worse than Google searches: the daily output of methane — a far more powerful greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide — caused by, no, not cows, but humans breaking wind.
Wait, where did this all start? Oh right, Google’s carbon footprint per search.
Not surprisingly, Google also takes Wissner-Gross’s research to task, arguing that its energy-efficient data centers generate just 0.2 grams of carbon dioxide per search, meaning it would take 1000 Google searches to equal the emissions of a car driven for one kilometer.
Head spinning yet? Mine is. Tea-time, anyone?
RELATED NEWS
Latest Insight
Newest electric cars make hybrids green with envy
It’s a good sign when cars once considered among the “greenest” around find
Does energy efficiency matter?
Just days on the job, Britain’s new Energy and Climate Change Secretary Edward
Respiration just typing the google search………
Average human being 15-25 breaths per minute @ 0.04g of CO2 per breath.
Take an average of 20 breathes for arguments sake…
20 x 0.04 = 0.8g per minute
Every minute typing at the computer generates 0.8g of C02, taking your 1000 user into the equation results in
0.8 x 1000 = 800g
Slightly more than a car per km.
You still have to include the energy input?
Regards
eco