The phaseout — aimed at cutting energy waste and carbon emissions and reducing electricity bills — was approved by EU Member States last December with support of the UK. In fact, a voluntary initiative to phase out old-fashioned bulbs started in 2007 with the keen support of a number of UK energy suppliers and retailers.
“We can no longer rely on light bulbs which waste 95 per cent of their energy as heat,” said Environment Minister Dan Norris. “We are glad the EU has put this measure in place to stop the waste of energy and money from old-fashioned high-energy bulbs. The UK has had a successful voluntary initiative in place for a few years, and now the rest of the EU will follow suit on a mandatory basis.”
Norris added, “This is great news for people who will pay less in electricity and even better news for the planet, as this will amount to 1 million tonnes of saved CO2 per year by 2020.”
According to the Department for Environment and Rural Affairs (Defra), energy-efficient bulbs now come in every size, shape and design, with dimmable versions and bayonet and screw fittings. The technology in low-energy bulbs has improved greatly and now the variety and choice is there for every household or business.
To encourage adoption of more efficient lamps, Defra also offered its Top 10 Light Bulb Myths:
They’re too expensive. Energy-efficient compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) have come down in price and will continue to do so. Some new CFLs are available at similar prices to old-fashioned bulbs (50p in some shops). Energy-efficient lamps save money, up to £3 – 6 per lamp per year according to the Energy Saving Trust, and so the payback can be seen in months. They also last longer so you don’t need to buy them as often. Halogen “look-alike” bulbs are now available to fit in standard sockets, though these lamps do not last as long as CFLs and only offer a 25 – 40 per cent savings compared to traditional bulbs.
They don’t fit all fittings. Yes, they do. Lamps are now much smaller than previous CFLs, and come in very similar sizes and shapes to incandescent lamps. They come in all bayonet and screw fittings now. Where fittings are really small, halogen “look-alike” lamps are available, although these do not offer the same energy savings. Dimmable versions are also available.
They don’t last as long as advertised. CFLs should last longer than incandescent lamps, though toward the end of life they fade over time rather than blow. Under EU legislation there will be a minimum guaranteed lifetime.
They take ages to warm up and give off dull light. Many lamps come on instantly and no lamp should come on later than a second or two after flicking the switch. The light now is flicker-free; although CFL bulbs used to operate at mains frequency (50Hz) they are now designed to operate at 1,000 times that frequency. The light is bright and clear, and a test conducted by the Energy Saving Trust suggests the majority of people cannot tell the difference between the light of a new CFL and an incandescent bulb.
They won’t save money. CFL low-energy bulbs save 80 per cent more energy compared to an old-fashioned bulb. According to the Energy Saving Trust, this can cut £3 – 6 per lamp off your energy bills.
I can’t recycle them. All local councils provide recycling facilities for CFLs and some retailers will take them back. Councils are looking at what they can do to make it easier to recycle these bulbs. With all new products, the end-of-life recycling can take a while to become widespread, but this is happening now and being taken very seriously by local and national government.
New types of bulbs raise health concerns. EU health experts have concluded there is not enough evidence to suggest modern lamps can aggravate epilepsy or migraines, but Defra and DoH have worked closely with groups representing those with specific sight- and light-sensitive skin conditions to minimise any adverse effects from the use of CFLs.
They contain mercury. The evidence shows that the amount of mercury in lamps is less than the mercury that would be otherwise released into the atmosphere by coal-fire power generation to produce the energy used by an incandescent lamp. The mercury cannot escape from an intact lamp and, even if the lamp should be broken, the very small amount of mercury contained in a single, modern CFL is most unlikely to cause any harm. Safe disposal tips for a smashed bulb can be found online.
Getting rid of old-fashioned light bulbs limits my choice. CFL bulbs are not the only ones on the markets. Halogen bulbs that fit into standard lighting sockets will remain on sale too, although these lamps don’t save as much energy as CFLs.
The phaseout will require me to change all my light bulbs. No one will be forced to change light bulbs or fittings, and retailers will be able to keep selling existing stocks. The EU measure, under the Eco-design for Energy-using Products Framework Directive, restricts the manufacture and import into the EU of 100-watt and frosted incandescent lamps from 1 September, with a phaseout of lamps of lower wattage by 2012.
Yes they are expensive,
and by kicking out the cheap light bulb competition, with fewer competitors, prices don’t necessarily fall either http://www.ceolas.net/#li1ax
They don’t fit all fittings -
candle CFLs for example are much bulkier, and the base of CFLs is much bigger than incandescent bases
The talk of “Halogen ‘look-alike’ bulbs simply doesn’t hold up –
the most useful frosted ones are banned – so lots of glare from them
Small light bulbs whether CFLs or LEDS simply can’t be made bright like incandescents.
Yes, CFLs are slower to come on
- especially in the cold, modern lights or not.
They won’t save me money
= lots of reasons why may be true – any CFL money savings are not as great as supposed, there are many factors involved.
see ceolas.net/#li13x onwards
especially ceolas.net/#li15x
eg power factor issues, lifespan, heat benefit of incandescents, brightness decrease etc as shown by numerous -and official- research.
Mercury
the old coal power mercury yarn is outdated, and emissions can and will be substantially reduced with new technology:
More: ceolas.net/#li19x
Many more reasons the ban is wrong see
ceolas.net/#li1x onwards
Keen as I am to save CO2 and money on energy bills, I have to disagree with points 1 and 4. The majority of the CFLs in our house (bought around 8 months ago) do take a long time to warm up (approx 5 mins to get to full light, and about 2 mins to get to enough light to see reasonably in the room) and were considerably more expensive than standard lightbulbs (around £8 each, if I remember). CFLs are improving, but there are big differences in quality.
A year ago we went out and purchased CFLs for our “most on” fittings including (most important, 100w incandescent equivalents for the garage – which were the most expensive). We didn’t give their expensive price a second thought as we were convinced by the media that they would “save us money in the long run”.
During the last year we have had to replace the garage lamps four times. The smaller ones lasted a “little” longer but eventually at least a third had faded to black.
Now, before you start griping in protest of what I am on about; they were from different manufacturers and the fittings are well ventilated (expect for the fittings that no CFLs to date will fit). Bottom line is; we’re now sick of the media hype about these being best for the consumer. The only people who are benefiting are power companies and CFL manufacturers. No, we didn’t keep the receipts for the first batch but, heck, we defiantly have kept them for replacements and have even permanently marked the replaced CFLs with the receipt number and date of purchase. We are about to go to war on CFL manufacturers and we are reverting back to incandescent until such time as technology makes it feasible for the consumer.
I’m totaly against “Energy saving bulps”.
1) They are not energy saving – to have the same level of light I need 3 or 4 of them.
2) They also waste energy to temperature.
Other think is that we are using them mostly at night so otherwise we need to use electricity to heat rooms.
3) Many of us feals that eyes are tired quicker then with normal lightbulps
So there are 2 ways of preserving ours lightbulps:
1) buy them now
2) buy them on holidays on non EU countries
CFLs are an improvement over incandescents as a lighting technology. Not only do they use a lot less electricity but they are getting better, and problems people may report in terms of light quality and bulb life should be diminishing. However, the next technology wave will offer even higher energy savings and advantages. LEDs are already emerging on the market and although today they are really expensive within five years they should be superior to incandescents or CFLs in almost all respects. Lifetime costs, bulb life (+50,000 hours), energy demand, light quality, flexibility. So if you can’t stand CFLs, then wait until your bulb burns out and replace it with an LED.
Clearly CFLs are a pretty good alternative to the old fashioned incandescent bulbs. They are lower energy and waste less to heat, they last longer (generally) and are now pretty cheap. And it’s convenient way for every household in Europe to play their part in a much needed reduction in CO2 emissions.
Just because this change has slightly and trivially encroached on your creature comforts by forcing you to use slightly longer bulbs that don’t fit the shade or by changing the colour of the light so it doesn’t match your lama-wool sofa now is not a big deal. Get over it and quietly play you part in reducing the massive amounts of damage we are inflicting on our planet.
Well… most of those “myths” are nonetheless…true!
Yes they are expensive,
and by kicking out the cheap light bulb competition, with fewer competitors, prices don’t necessarily fall either
http://www.ceolas.net/#li1ax
They don’t fit all fittings -
candle CFLs for example are much bulkier, and the base of CFLs is much bigger than incandescent bases
The talk of “Halogen ‘look-alike’ bulbs simply doesn’t hold up –
the most useful frosted ones are banned – so lots of glare from them
Small light bulbs whether CFLs or LEDS simply can’t be made bright like incandescents.
Yes, CFLs are slower to come on
- especially in the cold, modern lights or not.
They won’t save me money
= lots of reasons why may be true – any CFL money savings are not as great as supposed, there are many factors involved.
see ceolas.net/#li13x onwards
especially ceolas.net/#li15x
eg power factor issues, lifespan, heat benefit of incandescents, brightness decrease etc as shown by numerous -and official- research.
Mercury
the old coal power mercury yarn is outdated, and emissions can and will be substantially reduced with new technology:
More: ceolas.net/#li19x
Many more reasons the ban is wrong see
ceolas.net/#li1x onwards
Keen as I am to save CO2 and money on energy bills, I have to disagree with points 1 and 4. The majority of the CFLs in our house (bought around 8 months ago) do take a long time to warm up (approx 5 mins to get to full light, and about 2 mins to get to enough light to see reasonably in the room) and were considerably more expensive than standard lightbulbs (around £8 each, if I remember). CFLs are improving, but there are big differences in quality.
We cannot rely on light bulbs which consume 40% of more power than efficient light bulbs. So it’s good choice to go for energy efficient light bulbs.
A year ago we went out and purchased CFLs for our “most on” fittings including (most important, 100w incandescent equivalents for the garage – which were the most expensive). We didn’t give their expensive price a second thought as we were convinced by the media that they would “save us money in the long run”.
During the last year we have had to replace the garage lamps four times. The smaller ones lasted a “little” longer but eventually at least a third had faded to black.
Now, before you start griping in protest of what I am on about; they were from different manufacturers and the fittings are well ventilated (expect for the fittings that no CFLs to date will fit). Bottom line is; we’re now sick of the media hype about these being best for the consumer. The only people who are benefiting are power companies and CFL manufacturers. No, we didn’t keep the receipts for the first batch but, heck, we defiantly have kept them for replacements and have even permanently marked the replaced CFLs with the receipt number and date of purchase. We are about to go to war on CFL manufacturers and we are reverting back to incandescent until such time as technology makes it feasible for the consumer.
I’m totaly against “Energy saving bulps”.
1) They are not energy saving – to have the same level of light I need 3 or 4 of them.
2) They also waste energy to temperature.
Other think is that we are using them mostly at night so otherwise we need to use electricity to heat rooms.
3) Many of us feals that eyes are tired quicker then with normal lightbulps
So there are 2 ways of preserving ours lightbulps:
1) buy them now
2) buy them on holidays on non EU countries
CFLs are an improvement over incandescents as a lighting technology. Not only do they use a lot less electricity but they are getting better, and problems people may report in terms of light quality and bulb life should be diminishing. However, the next technology wave will offer even higher energy savings and advantages. LEDs are already emerging on the market and although today they are really expensive within five years they should be superior to incandescents or CFLs in almost all respects. Lifetime costs, bulb life (+50,000 hours), energy demand, light quality, flexibility. So if you can’t stand CFLs, then wait until your bulb burns out and replace it with an LED.
It amazes me how resistant to change people are!
Clearly CFLs are a pretty good alternative to the old fashioned incandescent bulbs. They are lower energy and waste less to heat, they last longer (generally) and are now pretty cheap. And it’s convenient way for every household in Europe to play their part in a much needed reduction in CO2 emissions.
Just because this change has slightly and trivially encroached on your creature comforts by forcing you to use slightly longer bulbs that don’t fit the shade or by changing the colour of the light so it doesn’t match your lama-wool sofa now is not a big deal. Get over it and quietly play you part in reducing the massive amounts of damage we are inflicting on our planet.